Designing an enterprise risk management curriculum for business studies : insights from a pilot program

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><collection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd">
<record>
<leader>00000cab a2200000 4500</leader>
<controlfield tag="001">MAP20140015658</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="003">MAP</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="005">20140530104848.0</controlfield>
<controlfield tag="008">140508e20140407esp|||p |0|||b|spa d</controlfield>
<datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">MAP</subfield>
<subfield code="b">spa</subfield>
<subfield code="d">MAP</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="084" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">7</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20140008087</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Acharyya, Madhu</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
<subfield code="a">Designing an enterprise risk management curriculum for business studies</subfield>
<subfield code="b">: insights from a pilot program</subfield>
<subfield code="c">Madhu Acharyya, Chris Brady</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
<subfield code="a">The latest financial crises have highlighted the centrality of managing risks across organizations. Internationally, Basel II/III, The Volcker Rule of the DoddFrank Act, and Vickers¿ Ring-Fence all propose stronger management of risk across banks and greater oversight of executive compensation to mitigate generic risk. Given this situation, it might be assumed that academia would also view risk as a central concern for its business programs. It seems not. There is a little evidence that academic curricula are being specifically designed to address this issue. This article examines an Enterprise Risk Management curriculum delivered to graduate student cohorts over 3 consecutive years. Four criteria were used to develop the new curriculum. First, it should take a holistic view of risk; second, the theories related to risk needed to be transformed from individual to group level; third, the dynamics of risk due to market factors needed to be understood; and finally, the way firms respond to crises needed to be observed and embedded in the curriculum.</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080591182</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Gerencia de riesgos</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080586799</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Planes de estudios</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="4">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20080608071</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Programas de formación</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="0">MAPA20140009084</subfield>
<subfield code="a">Brady, Chris</subfield>
</datafield>
<datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
<subfield code="w">MAP20077001748</subfield>
<subfield code="t">Risk management & insurance review</subfield>
<subfield code="d">Malden, MA : The American Risk and Insurance Association by Blackwell Publishing, 1999-</subfield>
<subfield code="x">1098-1616</subfield>
<subfield code="g">07/04/2014 Tomo 17 Número 1 - 2014 , p. 113-136</subfield>
</datafield>
</record>
</collection>